Page 220 - Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors, Vol. 1

Nicolai Levashov. Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors. Vol. 1

The communal and slave-owning societies had coexisted for thousands of years
until the economic system of the communal society, in which the white race contin-
ued to live, developed to the level that resulted in a technological and evolutional gap
between the communal and the slave-owning society and, later on, the feudal society.
Modern history represents the communal society as a primitive one which is, in prin-
ciple, not true. All people and tribes of the white race adhered to the Vedic world-
view and lived in clans and communities, the development of which, even at the level
of the primitive-communal society was considerably higher than in the tribes of other
races, for the reasons I have already mentioned.

This conclusion has no relation whatsoever to the “chosenness” of any particular
race, but only establishes the fact that different races, when rendering habitable dif-
ferent climatic areas of Midgard-earth, developed at different evolutional speeds,
and because of this cannot be at the same levels. Does the birch of mid-Russia really
discriminate against the dwarf-birch of the tundra because of its size? The tundra
birch’s size is determined by the natural climatic conditions in which this tree grows,
not because the mid-Russian birch “discriminates” against it. No one, if he is mental-
ly healthy, could have this kind of idea. But why then, when someone just hints at the
evolutional distinctions of races conditioned by distinctions in their genetics, bio-
chemistry or conditions of existence in one or another climatic zone is immediately
exposed to verbal attacks and accusations of racism? This almost always happens,
which means that it is necessary and advantageous for someone. The question is — to
whom and why? We will leave this question open... for the moment and will come
back to the analysis of the economic systems…

The chattel slavery system is not effective and progressive by definition, unlike
the communal society, correctly saying the Vedic society, where more and more ac-
tive, social and passive economic niches appeared, with the modernization of tools
and technologies, in the clans and tribes of the white race. The social organism grew
and developed quicker and quicker. The outcasts of the white race, subduing the
tribes and people of other races, were culturally and economically “torn” away from
their former congeners. Their knowledge, mainly in the military sphere, which they
had at the moment of the enslavement of other races, provided them with an evolu-
tional advantage for several millennia, but, nevertheless, not forever. The outcasts
were in their essence social parasites and could not create anything new for many
reasons. The only thing they could do was to keep the knowledge which they had be-
fore their banishment. When they came to a new place, they converted their
knowledge into an object of worship and made it accessible only to their descendants.
They converted it into dogma which prevented anything new from entering. The seg-
regation and dogmatism “mummified” these civilizations.

The Civilization of Egypt serves as the brightest example of this kind of ap-
proach. A group of people of the white race settled in the territory of Northern Africa
after the planetary catastrophe 13 016 years ago (2007). Possessing pretty high
knowledge, they demonstrated the kind of abilities to the tribes of the black race
which were far beyond their understanding and created in the minds of these people
the image of their divine origin and converted them into slaves. They created a rigid

Back to contents 220