Page 267 - Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors, Vol. 1
P. 267
Nicolai Levashov. Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors. Vol. 1
A – primitive-communal society;
B – communal society;
C – slave-owning society.
Red rectangle in the middle – “the Jews”.
What they really mastered to perfection is how to shed a tear to evoke sympathy.
The Israelites are indeed great actors. When it was advantageous for them or they felt
a mighty force, they were meek as lambs, but should a people or nation “weaken” or
“turn” its back to them, they struck immediately and if the people which received
them into their “house” had problems, they showed their real face and this face was
not angelic…
Gradually, they acquired more experience in what they did and worked out their
style, tactic and strategy. I would like to analyze one Judaic tactic which they used to
achieve their aims (usually they used any “opportune” situations, both natural and ar-
tificially created by them). It was Persia that again got under the next Judaic experi-
th
ment. The convenient, for them, situation appeared at the end of the 5 century A.D.
in the reign of the king Kavadh. Then, Israelites of Simeon tribe lived there.
th
The end of the 5 century A.D. was very hard for Persia. For several consecu-
tive years nature had given very unpleasant surprises — natural calamities, drought
and masses of locusts, which resulted in poor harvest and led to hunger. The prices
for bread and other food sky-rocketed and it became simply inaccessible to most peo-
ple. In order to feed hungry children, people were forced to sell their simple gold and
silver jewelry to usurer-Israelites very cheaply. But ordinary people did not have
many valuable things and sooner or later the time came when there was nothing they
could sell to a usurer in order to buy bread for their hungry children at exorbitant
prices fixed by the Israelites who traditionally controlled the bread trade and al-
ways used any kind of calamity as a wonderful possibility to get a super-profit; they
did not have any sense of morals whatsoever in relation to the goyim. According to
Judaic tradition they considered any non-Israelite lower than an animal (read the To-
rah, Talmud and even the Old Testament). When mothers had nothing to feed to their
children, when fathers saw that their children starved to death and wives sold them-
selves to save them from the death of hunger... some people appeared and began to
tell to these mothers and fathers that while their children swelled of hunger, the aris-
tocrats ate fastidiously, that their children did not swell of hunger and did not die, etc,
and that all evil in general was in wealth, that all people were brothers and equal
and that it was necessary to take the aristocrats’ riches and justly and equally dis-
tribute them among all…
It is of interest that it was, mainly, the Israelites who yelled about it. And the
most interesting thing is that they told the truth, but … not the whole truth! The
truth is always truth, despite being incomplete – someone may say, the Israelites first
of all, but they always report the truth which is for “some” reason advantageous for
them and hush up the one which is not! Indeed, the children of the aristocrats did not
starve to death and did not swell from starvation. But they, just as their parents, died
on the battle fields, protecting the country from enemies, while the children of peas-
Back to contents 267