Page 303 - Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors, Vol. 1
P. 303

Nicolai Levashov. Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors. Vol. 1

            ites (but for other people — the keepers of interests of one or another nation), they
            aimed the economy and policy of a country in the direction advantageous for the Is-
            raelites.

                  The fact that they attended Christian or other churches outwardly demonstrating
            adherence to one or another religion, culture, people or nation does not matter, nor
            does the fact that they vowed fidelity to a nation and country: according to Judaic law
            it is not obligatory to keep any oath, promise or agreement with non-Israelites! How-
            ever,  it  encouraged  these  kinds  of  actions,  if  they  served  the  approaching  “Great”
            goal — world domination. This is not a slander. It is enough to open and read the
            “sacred” books, the Torah or Talmud, and everyone can find hundreds of examples
            which  confirm  this  approach.  According  to  Judaic  law,  any  oath,  obligation  and
            agreement must be fulfilled only in relation to the Israelites, as for the rest of the peo-
            ple (non-Israelites): it is clearly said that they are not people, they are not even ani-
            mals and, therefore, non-fulfillment of any obligation and oath in relation to these
            creatures is an action which the God encourages, especially, if this brings benefit.

                  Thus, when industrial production and capitalistic relationships appeared in so-
            ciety,  the  Israelites  began  to  penetrate  actively  into  other  categories  of  economic
            niches, using the capital they  had accrued by robbery. The Judaic capital began to
            penetrate into active economic niches, because industrial production needs substantial
            financial investments, and at the moment of its origin most free funds which were not
            “tied” to the land were in Judaic hands, as a result of their aforementioned tactic. Cer-
            tainly, not only the Israelites possessed free finances, but most national capital was
            isolated and uncoordinated and did not form a system, while Judaic capital was unit-
            ed into one indivisible system, and the amount of capital which they controlled was
            simply immeasurably more than the single capital of even very rich people. There-
            fore, all more or less interesting, for the Israelites, industrial enterprises sooner or lat-
            er appeared in their hands.

                  However, the Israelites usually preferred to wait, while the  goyim created and
            drove one or another production to high profitability in order to bring it to bankruptcy
            and buy it for a song; after which this enterprise “miraculously” became profitable
            again.  The  parasitic  system  always  remains  parasitic  in  everything!  The  Israelites
            have a special system of bringing industrial enterprises they are interested in to bank-
            ruptcy worked out to perfection. In order to do this they use mass media which they
            control, the state-bureaucratic institutions and sometimes they resort to a direct take-
            over of the property by means of “people’s” revolutions organized according to one
            and the same scenario (Fig. 41).


















                  Back to contents                         303
   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308