Page 316 - Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors, Vol. 1

Nicolai Levashov. Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors. Vol. 1

sparing blood! Certainly, it was Russian blood not being spared. Leyba Bronstein ex-
pounded his paymasters’ plans as the idea of Permanent Revolution. It would seem
very strange to hear this kind of requirement from Messrs Schiff and Rothschild: in
fact they were the richest persons in the world! However, it is strange only on the
face of it; the oddity disappears when we look closely at it. In order to do this, we
should cast aside the verbal “husk” and analyze what communism, socialism, devel-
oped socialism and so on really is, taking into account that the matter is not in the
name, but in the essence.

The “classics” of Marxism-Leninism spoke about it much and long. Ulyanov-
Lenin (Blank) proposed his famous slogan: “Socialism is the Soviet power plus the
electrification of the whole country!” This slogan is the brightest example of phrase-
mongering which has no content. However, if we try to give its true essence, we can
say that: “Socialism is state capitalism, plus the slave-owning society”!

Certainly, everyone who lived in soviet times had a quite different thing ham-
mered into their head, but slavery is slavery, despite any beautiful words which may
cover it. With state capitalism everything belongs to the state, including people
themselves, and each person is a little “cog” in the state “machinery” and does only
what is necessary for the state.

But what is a state?
First and foremost, it is the people who determine what all the rest must do. The
question is: who, (why and to what ends?) gives the right to decide the fate of the
overwhelming majority of people to a certain group? Can it really be the majority of
people themselves? Certainly not; as the practice has shown, it has not proved to be

true for almost seventy five years of Soviet power in the lands of the Russian Empire.
The people themselves have never decided anything: it was the “servants” of the peo-
ple who did it for them, because people, as stated, are unable to understand what is
good for them, and someone must decide for them and instead of them. The only
problem was in finding the decision makers for these “unreasoning” people.
The “servants” of the people stopped trusting these very people when the ma-
jority of the deputies of the All Russian Constituent Assembly, which the Bolshevists
were forced to convoke (they had to observe the visibility of the legality of the Coup
D'etat they had carried out), were not “inspired” enough with the “loftiness” of the
Bolshevist slogans and the “depth” of their care about the welfare of people and

“universal” happiness, which they wanted to bring to these “irresponsible” people
who did not understand how lucky they were and said no. On January, 6 1918 the
Bolshevists disposed of this “irresponsible” Constituent Assembly using force, be-
cause only 24% of the electors voted for them. Since then and until the collapse of the
Soviet Union, the people “elected” only according to previously prepared lists which
were given to them. The “servants” of the people did not want to “risk it” and depend
on the “ignorance” of the people. They actively helped people to get rid of it, “facili-
tating” the task for them! They did not want to leave the “bright” future of the people
dependent upon chance and people’s “ignorance”!
So, what did the Israelites Schiff and Rothschild want? Did they really want to

Back to contents 316