Page 249 - Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors, Vol. 1

Nicolai Levashov. Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors. Vol. 1

marked by the lamb’s blood. (Why blood? Was there no paint in Egypt?) The Isra-
elites had a very interesting “slavery” in Egypt. “Slaves” lived in houses which were,
at least, not worse than the houses of their “owners”, and the confused spirit of the
Lord found it difficult to find out where the Israelites did and did not live, and only
the sacrificial lamb’s blood on the door allowed him to solve an incredibly compli-
cated problem, thus, avoiding punishing the “poor” slave-Israelites due to some terri-
ble misunderstanding. However, the nonsense is not yet over.

The Bible says that every Judaic family must kill a lamb to mark the door of the
house with its blood. Is it really possible that a slave could possess his own house and
his own lamb, which, by the way, should have a mother and father? Maybe they for-
got that a slave, by definition, can have neither a house nor sheep, but he himself is
the property of his owner, as are his children, born into slavery… I think that there is
no need to continue, everything is quite clear.

In addition, when leaving “Egyptian slavery”, the Israelites took with them
about three hundred tons of jewelry and different adornments made of gold, silver
and copper. If we take into account that only native gold and silver was used at that
time, such a huge amount of adornments made of these precious metals was unbe-
lievable! By the way, to whom did those adornments belong? Were they really the
property of poor “enslaved” Israelites who, on leaving Egypt, took with them just
nice trinkets dear to their heart? And if those “nice trinkets” were not theirs, how did
three hundred tons of gold, silver and copper adornments appear in the slaves’ wag-
ons? Note: even copper adornments were valuable then.

It would be ridiculous to assume that Egyptian slave-owners released their
slaves and gave them the greater part of their treasure. In only one case could slaves
leave a country and take an amount of such material value — a successful revolt,
which should result in taking power in the country. However, there are no documents
related to the history of Ancient Egypt which mention any revolt, neither before, nor
after the exodus. Moreover, there are no historical documents about any significant
revolt of slaves in Ancient Egypt.

Another interesting picture is observed: there was no revolt of the Israelites
against their “exploiters” but they abandoned Ancient Egypt with an, enormous for
those times, amount of treasure... It could only have happened if they never were
slaves in the Country of Artificial Mountains, but occupied a very privileged position
there and most likely, left Ancient Egypt because they already had nothing to do
there.

There is one more interesting observation related to the Judaic holiday of Pe-
sakh. According to the text of the biblical legend there is a clear dividing line be-
tween Egyptians and Israelites. This means that the Israelites did not consider them-
selves Egyptians which confirms the fact of their arrival in Ancient Egypt from the
outside.
Moreover, if we ignore the word “slavery” in the Judaic legend of four centuries
of Egyptian slavery, (because they never were slaves there), and pay attention only to
the four hundred years, another very interesting piece of information emerges.

Back to contents 249