Page 98 - Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors, Vol. 1
P. 98

Nicolai Levashov. Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors. Vol. 1

            mastering of speech and subjective thinking at this stage of evolutional development
            is a key for moving  on to  the second  stage  of the  extra-uterine development—the
            stage of the reasoning animal. If, for one or another reason, a human child does not
            get the necessary volume of information, he will remain at the stage of the animal
            forever.  This  is  not  a  theoretical  supposition.  There  are  some  well-known  cases
            when,  for  one  or  another  reason,  wild  animals  brought  up  human  children.  When
            these  “Mowglis”  returned  to  human  society  being  more  than  nine  years  old,  they
            could never acquire even the minimum skills inherent to man. Their conduct forever
            remained the conduct of those animals with which they grew up, in spite of the fact
            that they were absolutely healthy physically. And they were not able to learn to talk
            and behave like man to the end of their lives. Thus, man is born only potentially rea-
            soning and there is a temporal interval within which a child can realize this possibil-
            ity or remain at the animal stage forever.

                  In the majority of cases by the age of nine, children who were brought up in the
            family environment accumulate the critical volume of information necessary for the
            neurons of the brain to be unfolded at the third material level and the development of
            the third material (astral) bodies of neurons begins. Man enters into the second phase
            of his development — the stage of reasoning animal. Let us clear up the situation
            and determine some concepts. If instincts control the conduct of man, this man is a
            reasoning animal, because, if man behaves exactly like any other animal — sub-
            mits to the call and force of instincts, he is no different from them. If man is able to
            control the instincts more or less and behaves according to reason, conscience and
            heart, he is a man not only in his appearance, but also in fact.

                  In nature there are several types of living organisms which exist in the form of
            permanent  associations,  the  most  well-known  are  bees,  ants,  termites  and wasps.
            For  example,  ants  and  termites  build  their  cities  with  a  shocking  exactness  which
            people have not yet learnt to build their cities and dwellings. When they build their
            termitary or ant-hill, they simultaneously make the inner tunnels of the ant-hill dove-
            tail into one another with an amazing accuracy of a fraction of a millimeter, although
            neither  termites  nor  ants  use  measuring  instruments  like  people.  In  addition,  they
            have a strict hierarchy: there is the queen or mother at the head and castes: warriors,
            intelligence officers, guards, builders, educators, hunters, storekeepers, cleaners, etc.
            Ants, for example, even farm herds of aphids and grow the simplest mushrooms in
            the ant-hill or near it. Both ants and termites wage war with their neighbours for terri-
            tory and food, attack and go on organised hunts for their natural enemies. These spe-
            cies have their own language of intercourse, etc. Bees, for example, pass to each oth-
            er the exact co-ordinates of flowerings plants full of nectar and a lot of other things
            with the help of the language of motion.

                  It  is  possible  to  continue  describing  the  activity  of  these  communities  which
            cannot be called other than reasoning. But we do not call these living creatures rea-
            soning, because if we take a termite, ant, bee or wasp, they will not show any signs
            of reasoning conduct. They behave reasonably only within the limits of action of their






                  Back to contents                          98
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103